Demountable and reusable architecture: promoting a true circular economy in ecuadorian industry

Main Article Content

Cristina Paola Suárez-Loor
Adriana Avilés-Dávila
Carlos Suárez-Castro
Ambar Amparo Basantes-Quishpe

Abstract

The construction industry in Ecuador faces the challenge of transitioning toward a sustainable model that surpasses the linear scheme of extraction, production, and disposal, which is responsible for high resource consumption and significant construction and demolition waste (CDW) generation. This study analyzes the feasibility of implementing demountable and reusable architecture as a strategy to foster a true circular economy in the sector. Based on a mixed-method approach with a predominantly qualitative design and supporting quantitative analysis, the research included a documentary review of regulatory frameworks, official statistics, and international studies, complemented by semi-structured interviews with key industry stakeholders. Findings indicate that between 2015 and 2022, CDW generation and virgin material consumption exhibited an upward trend, confirming the dependency on traditional building models. However, prospective scenario modeling suggests that adopting design for disassembly principles could reduce waste generation by 33.3% by 2030, while also creating a secondary market for reusable materials. The evaluation of local resources highlighted Guadua bamboo and cross-laminated timber as the most promising materials due to their low carbon footprint and ease of reuse. These results demonstrate that demountable architecture is not only environmentally feasible but also offers economic and social opportunities by recovering ancestral knowledge and promoting sustainable value chains. The study concludes that transitioning to this paradigm represents a strategic pathway for ensuring resilience, innovation, and sustainability in Ecuador’s construction industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suárez-Loor, C. P., Avilés-Dávila, A., Suárez-Castro, C., & Basantes-Quishpe, A. A. (2025). Demountable and reusable architecture: promoting a true circular economy in ecuadorian industry. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurial Studie, 9(4), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.37956/jbes.v9i4.403
Section
Articles

References

AlJaber, A., Martinez-Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2023). Barriers and enablers to the adoption of circular economy concept in the building sector: a systematic literature review. Buildings, 13(11), 2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112778

Baker-Brown, D. (2017). The re-use atlas: A designer's guide towards a circular economy. Riba Publishing

BAMB. (2020). Buildings as Material Banks: Integrating Energy and Material Cycles. BAMB Project. https://www.bamb2020.eu/

Calle Chuinda, W. M., González Redrován, T. J., & Álvarez Vera, M. S. (2023). Análisis de la caña guadua como material de construcción sostenible para el desarrollo del ecoturismo en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. RELIGACIÓN. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 8(38), e2301109. 10.46652/rgn.v8i38.1109

CEPAL, N. (2021). Economía circular en América Latina y el Caribe: oportunidad para una recuperación transformadora.

Dams, B., Maskell, D., Shea, A., Allen, S., Driesser, M., Kretschmann, T., ... & Emmitt, S. (2021). A circular construction evaluation framework to promote designing for disassembly and adaptability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128122

Diéguez Santana, K., Carvajal Padilla, V. P., Ambuludi Paredes, R. R., Chávez, H., & Grefa, E. (2021). Evaluación de impacto ambiental en el sector de la construcción de viviendas: Caso estudio viviendas del MIDUVI en el cantón “La Maná”, Cotopaxi, Ecuador. Revista de Iniciación Científica, 7(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.33412/rev-ric.v7.1.3053

FAO, T. (2022). The State of the World’s Forests 2022. Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. Rome, FAO

Gorgolewski, M. (2017). Resource salvation: the architecture of reuse. John Wiley & Sons.

Huovila, P., Iyer-Raniga, U., & Maity, S. (2019, August). Circular economy in the built environment: supporting emerging concepts. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 297, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012003

INEC. (2020). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Obtenido de Municipales 2020: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/gad-municipales-2020/

MacArthur, Ellen & Heading, Heading. (2019). How the circular economy tackles climate change. Ellen MacArthur Found, 1, 1-71.

Orbelians, M. (2023). Design for disassembly in life cycle assessment and circularity evaluation (Master's thesis, NTNU).

UNEP, U. (2022). 2022 global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector.

UNEP, UNEP Copenhagen Climate Centre (UNEP-CCC). (2021). Environment programme. Obtenido de Emissions Gap Report 2021: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021