The arbitration clause in administrative proceedings

Main Article Content

Nicolasa Genoveva Panchana Suárez
Karen Vanessa Diaz Panchana
Sandra Canalias Lamas

Abstract

In the review of research published in academic articles (including doctoral or undergraduate theses) an extensive bibliography is obtained covering concepts of administrative processes, public administration and Arbitration Agreement; this work defines the terms and describes the phases or stages of the administrative process. This article will serve as a tool for academic work and, therefore, should be integrated into the programs involved in educational tasks; here the text includes the efforts of the authors to give the reader a tool to develop a process of analysis and intellectual confrontation that allows you to achieve better results in your work, academic counseling, funding related to the knowledge of the administrative procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Panchana Suárez, N. G., Diaz Panchana, K. V., & Canalias Lamas, S. (2023). The arbitration clause in administrative proceedings. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurial Studie, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.37956/jbes.v7i1.324
Section
Articles

References

Vasquez Ponce, G. O., Parrales Pilozo, D. H., & Morales Chávez, V. E. (2021).

Administrative process: determinant factor in the organizational development of

MSMEs. Revista Publicando, 8(31), 258-278. doi:10.51528/rp.vol8.id2249

Cano Plata, C. A. (2017). The administration and the administrative process. Bogotá.

Retrieved from Com.mx: https://ccie.com.mx/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/Proceso-Administrativo.pdf

O'Brien, E. C. (2019). THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT. Studies in Business Law ISSN

-9404, 18. Retrieved from

https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/esdeem/article/view/24141

GENERAL ORGANIC CODE OF PROCEDURES [COGEP] (2015 (Ecuador)). In Law

No. 0 of 2016 (p. Article 326).

Mero-Vélez, J. M. (2018). Company, administration and administrative process. Revista

Científica FIPCAEC (Fomento de la investigación y publicación en Ciencias Administrativas,

Económicas y Contables), 3(8), 84-102. doi:10.23857/fipcaec.v3i8.59.

Schmidt, M. A., Tennina, M. E., & Obiol, L. C. (2018). The control function in

organizations. Center for Management Studies, 2(2), 4-6. Retrieved from

https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/cea/article/view/1349

Hernández, J., & Hernández, S. (2019). Stages of the Administrative Process. Boletín

Científico de la Escuela Superior de Atotonilco de Tula, 6(11), 66-67. Retrieved from

https://repository.uaeh.edu.mx/revistas/index.php/atotonilco/article/download/37

/5878

Arzube, Z. R. (2017). Management and its relationship. CE Contributions toEconomics, 5.

Solís Sierra, M. (2018). Development of an administrative management model for the

system of linkage with the community of the Instituto Tecnológico Superior Juan

Bautista Aguirre del Cantón Daule. Universidad y Sociedad, 10.

Núñez Torres, K. (2019). The evolution of administrative procedure and the COA in

Ecuador. Revista San Gregorio, 1(33), 149-159. doi:10.36097/rsan.v1i33.1029.

Icaza Ortiz (June 29, 2019). Reforms to the COGEP and its application to the Contentious

Administrative Procedure. Retrieved from Icaza Ortiz Abogados:

https://icazaortiz.com/2019/06/28/reformas-al-cogep-y-su-aplicacion-alprocedimiento-contencioso-administrativo/

López, M. (2020). Análisis de las excepciones previas del art. 153 numeral 4 del COGEP.

Universidad de Los Hemisferios, Quito. Retrieved from

http://dspace.uhemisferios.edu.ec:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/832

Presidential Decree No. 165 - LAM Regulations [With force of law] (August 18, 2021).

Retrieved from https://corralrosales.com/decreto-presidencial-numero-165-

reglamento-lam/

Yepez-Almeida, L. E. (2019). Arbitration agreement: doctrinal assumptions of pathology,

principles and interpretation and its pro-arbitration approach in Ecuadorian law.

Master's thesis. Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Quito. Retrieved from

https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/8168

Pérez, A. (2019). Arbitration in Ecuadorian public law. Revista Ecuatoriana de Arbitraje(10),

-276. doi:10.36649/rea1010.

Briones, W., et al. (2019). Management of administrative processes in African palm

extractors. . Ciencias Holguín, 1-14.

Castañedo, A. (2018). Arbitration and mediation. Their complementarity in the context of

international trade. Havana: University of Havana.

García, E. & Fernández, T. (2020). Curso de Derecho Administrativo. Volume I. Madrid:

Civitas.

Loo Gutiérrez, M. (2017). The meaning of administrative procedure. . Revista Derecho

del Estado. , 155-175.

Alonso, L. (2013). Review "La necesaria innovación en las instituciones administrativas:

organización, procedimiento, función pública, contratos administrativos y

regulación" by Rivero Ortega, Ricardo. RIPS. Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y

Sociológicas, 165-168.

Navarro González, R. (2017). La motivación de los actos administrativos. Thomson Reuters:

Aranzadi.

Tirado, J. (2021). Notes on the act of initiation of the administrative sanctioning

procedure. Revista de Estudios de la Administración Local y Autonómica, 173-189.

Rojas, E. (2011). El debido procedimiento administrativo. Derecho PUCP, 177-188.

Ortiz, E. (1981). Nullities of the administrative act in the general law of public

administration. Revista del Seminario Internacional de Derecho Administrativo.

National Assembly (2008). Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Quito: Registro Oficial.

National Assembly (2017). Código Orgánico Administrativo. Quito: Registro Oficial.

Núñez, K. (2019). The evolution of administrative procedure and the COAin Ecuador.

Independent researcher, 159-168.

Gordillo, A. (2017). Tratado de Derecho Administrativo. Buenos Aires: Fundación de

Derecho Administrativo.

Vintimilla, J. (2013). Principles and Rules as new sources of Justice in light of the

Ecuadorian Ius Novus. Iuris Dictio, 47-56.

Petoft, A. (2020). The concept and instances of general principles of administrative law:

Towards a global administrative law. Constitutional Issues, 309-335.

Haro, M. & Villacrés, M. (2021). The principles of administrative law: its positivization.

Society & Technology Journal, 61-75.

Moreta, A. (2019). PROCEDIMIENTO ADMINISTRATIVO Y SANCIONADOR EN EL COA.

Quito: Ediciones Continente.

Alvarado, S. (2022). Legal and procedural importance of the transaction. FIPCAEC , 116-

Torrealba, M. (2017). Trends in the enforcement of judgments in the Ibero-American

administrative process (With special reference to Spain, Peru, Costa Rica, Colombia and

Venezuela). La Coruña: Universidade de A Coruña.

Castillo, M. (2018). Evidence in arbitration. LEX N° 21 , 199-416.

Dias, P. & Cruz, A. (2020). International Commercial Arbitration. Llamkasun, 11-19.

Castillo, M., et al. (2019). Subjects susceptible to arbitration. LEX N° 23, 187-2011.

Toraya, J. (2022). Implementation of virtual arbitration in Mexico for the resolution of

disputes arising in e-commerce. . Revista De Investigación Académica Sin Frontera:

División De Ciencias Económicas Y Sociales, 3-25.

Pastor, F. (2020). SPANISH ARBITRATION IN THE TUAT QUESTION. Illes i imperis,

-286.

Córdova, K., et al. (2019). Some considerations on mediation and arbitration. Revista

Universidad y Sociedad, 287-295.

Villalba, J. & Moscoso, R. (2008). ORIGINS AND CURRENT PANORAMA OF

ARBITRATION. Prolegomena. Rights and Values, 141-170.

Paredes, F. (2018). Ecuador relaxes its international arbitration rules to attract

investment. CIAR GLOBAL. The Journal of Arbitration of the Ibero-American

Community., 7-12.

Nicaragua. Chamber of Commerce and Services (2017). International Arbitration. CMA.

Retrieved from Centro de Mediación y Arbitraje.: http://www.cmanicaragua.

com.ni/index.php/nuestros-servicios/arbitrajeinternacional/

Sequeira, B. I. (2020). The principle of severability of the arbitration clause and its legal

scope in the interpretation and modification of contracts. Revista Ciencia Jurídica y

Política, 28-54.

Labbé, J. P. (2018). The extension of the arbitration agreement to apparent third parties

in International Commercial Arbitration: analysis of some theories. Revista de

derecho (Coquimbo), 201-236.

Paraguacuto, D., et al. (2014). The interrelationship between the judge and the

international arbitrator. A comparative study between France and Colombia. Legal

Mission, 251 - 286.

Martin, R. (2018). Arbitration and due process. In J.C. Morón & J. Danós (Coords.). Estudios

de derecho administrativo. Lima: Gaceta Jurídica.

Alejos, O. (2019). Unbalanced arbitration agreements in public contracts under the state

contracting law. . PUC Law, 347-370.

Pulido, N., et al. (August 04, 2021). No todos los caminos conducen a Roma...La cláusula

patológica: aproximaciones conceptuales y problemática actual. Retrieved from

Arbanza: https://arbanza.com/?p=27286

Timaná, L. (June 06, 2022). Statutory arbitration: A look at its importance. Retrieved from

Ius et lustitia: https://boletinsociedades.com/2022/06/06/el-arbitraje-estatutarioun-vistazo-a-su-importancia/

Ortegón, S. (2022). Subjective arbitrability in the trust contract in Colombia. Estudios

Socio-Jurídicos Journal, 1-18.

Espinosa, I. (April 2020). The incidence of international public policy in international

commercial arbitration. Retrieved from REPOSITORIO COMILLAS:

https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/38579