For Cabello (2017) and Chakhar (2003) (Cited in Ramirez , 2007, p. 36). They deal with
multicriteria decision techniques that constitute a rational and objective tool. Both
authors recognize that the multicriteria matrix allows the decision-maker to compare
different alternatives. For Cabello, it allows a better understanding of the decision
processes underlying systemic processes. Chakhar (2003), however, this procedure or
technique allows the decision-maker to compare different alternatives based on the
weights assigned.
In the same line for Toskano (2005) (Quoted in Grajales Quintero, Serrano Moya, &
Hahn Von-H, 2013, p. 299), multicriteria evaluation and decision methods comprise a
set of qualitative and/or quantitative criteria, which may be in conflict, so it is necessary
to optimize several simultaneous objective functions and have the participation of
multiple decision makers and experts, which from rational and consistent evaluation
procedures, allow making decisions on problems that contain intangible aspects to be
evaluated. (Grajales Quintero, Serrano Moya, & Hahn Von-H, 2013).
The use of the multi-criteria methodology is little applied in the tourism field as
evidenced in the literature reviews carried out, it can be stated that it is more widely
used to evaluate environmental, health and territorial problems, among others. (Franco
Maass et al., 2009). "This methodology has been widely used in different environmental,
social, economic and cultural sciences" (Joo Nagata & Alvarado Peterson, 2013, p. 144).
Vargas Isaza mentions that when dealing with complex real-world problems, this
technique is important because it addresses different points of view in relation to
conflicts and leads to decision-making and participation on the part of the affected agents,
since this technique uses different dimensions of analysis: socio-cultural, economic,
ecological-environmental or others, Munda (2002) (Cited in Vargas Isaza, 2005, p. 88).
(Castellanos Menjura , 2015)
Multicriteria evaluation are very important methodological tools to analyze the intrinsic
and extrinsic criteria in tourism (Enríquez Martínez et al., 2010), therefore these
techniques allow a better qualitative and quantitative assessment resulting in a better
selection of the elements of study. These techniques are essential for tourism planning
since "planning does not only respond to a single design, it inevitably depends on the
characteristics of the territory and its objectives" Yumisaca et al, (2019).
Based on the above, the research question was how it affects (EMC) in the use of the
resources of the Jimbura parish. Given that in terms of planning, the multi-criteria
evaluation is strategic for the authorities to take this study as a reference and join efforts
in the implementation of products, infrastructure and services in the natural and cultural
attractions that contain greater tourist vocation.
The results of the EMC research in Jimbura parish have shown that there are three
tourist attractions with hierarchies one and two, with local and regional diffusion. The
attractions that have local and regional diffusion are attractions that need accessibility
infrastructure and tourist services. In addition, security is essential for tourists who
come to this place to have a better appreciation of the destination to visit.